top of page

Get the latest news, tips, and exclusive offers on solar products delivered straight to your inbox.

Thanks for submitting!

Aluminum vs Copper Solar Cable: Cost, Ampacity, Voltage Drop & Which Is Better?

Sep 1
15 min read

Copper has traditionally been the most common conductor material used in photovoltaic cables, but aluminum PV cable is increasingly considered for commercial and utility-scale solar projects where cable quantity, conductor size, weight and total balance-of-system cost become important.

That does not mean aluminum is automatically better than copper.

Copper provides higher electrical conductivity, allowing more current to be carried through a smaller conductor. Aluminum, on the other hand, is lighter and generally less expensive, which can make it attractive when large conductor sizes and long cable runs are required.


The correct choice therefore depends on the application.

A residential rooftop installation using short cable runs may favor copper, while a large ground-mounted solar plant using kilometers of cable may have very different economic and engineering priorities.


This guide compares aluminum vs copper solar cable based on conductivity, ampacity, cable size, voltage drop, weight, cost, termination and application to help solar developers, EPC contractors and system designers select the appropriate conductor for their PV project.



Aluminum vs Copper Solar Cable: Quick Comparison

Factor

Aluminum PV Cable

Copper PV Cable

Electrical conductivity

Lower

Higher

Ampacity at same AWG

Lower

Higher

Required conductor size

Usually larger

Usually smaller

Weight

Lower

Higher

Material cost

Generally lower

Generally higher

Voltage drop at same size

Higher

Lower

Space requirement

Greater

Lower

Termination requirements

Requires aluminum-compatible termination

More widely supported

Long-distance large cable runs

Often attractive

Effective but can be expensive

Residential rooftop PV

Less common

Common

Utility-scale solar

Strong potential

Widely used

Main advantage

Cost and weight

Conductivity and compact size

The biggest mistake when comparing aluminum and copper solar cable is looking at only one of these factors.

For example, aluminum may cost less per meter, but it normally requires a larger cross-sectional area than copper to achieve comparable electrical performance.

Copper may require a smaller conductor, but large quantities of copper can significantly increase cable material cost and project weight.

The correct comparison is therefore not simply:

Price per meter

It should be:

Total installed cost + electrical performance + cable size + voltage drop + termination requirements.


What Is the Main Difference Between Copper and Aluminum Solar Cable?

What Is the Main Difference Between Copper and Aluminum Solar Cable?

The fundamental difference is electrical conductivity.

Copper conducts electricity more effectively than aluminum on an equal cross-sectional-area basis. Industry technical guidance commonly places aluminum conductivity at approximately 61% of copper conductivity.

This has an important practical consequence:

An aluminum conductor generally needs a larger cross-sectional area than a copper conductor to achieve similar resistance and current-carrying performance.

However, conductor performance is not determined by conductivity alone.

Aluminum has a strong conductivity-to-weight ratio. The Aluminum Association notes that aluminum wiring provides approximately twice the conductivity per pound compared with copper and highlights its cost and weight advantages in electrical transmission and distribution applications.

This explains why copper dominates many smaller electrical connections while aluminum becomes increasingly attractive as conductor size and cable quantity increase.



Aluminum vs Copper Electrical Conductivity

Electrical conductivity determines how easily current can pass through the conductor.

Copper has higher conductivity than aluminum, which means that, for the same conductor cross-sectional area:

As resistance decreases:

  • Voltage drop decreases

  • Resistive power loss decreases

  • Heat generation decreases

  • More current can generally be carried through a given conductor size

This is why a copper conductor and an aluminum conductor of exactly the same AWG or mm² size should not be treated as electrically equivalent.

For a PV system designer, the practical rule is:

Do not replace copper PV cable with the same-size aluminum cable without recalculating the circuit.

Ampacity and voltage drop should both be checked again.



Aluminum vs Copper PV Wire Ampacity

Ampacity is the amount of current a conductor can carry under specified installation and temperature conditions without exceeding its allowable temperature.

For the same AWG size, copper generally has greater ampacity than aluminum.

The following comparison uses commonly published NEC-based reference ampacities at 75°C.

Wire Size

Copper Ampacity at 75°C

Aluminum Ampacity at 75°C

10 AWG

35 A

30 A

8 AWG

50 A

40 A

6 AWG

65 A

50 A

4 AWG

85 A

65 A

3 AWG

100 A

75 A

2 AWG

115 A

90 A

1 AWG

130 A

100 A

1/0 AWG

150 A

120 A

2/0 AWG

175 A

135 A

3/0 AWG

200 A

155 A

4/0 AWG

230 A

180 A

These reference values show why an aluminum conductor normally cannot replace copper on a one-to-one AWG basis. Published ampacity tables also emphasize that temperature, conductor grouping, equipment limitations and other code requirements must be considered before determining final allowable ampacity.



Does Aluminum Solar Cable Need to Be Larger Than Copper?

Usually, yes.

Because aluminum has lower conductivity, a larger aluminum conductor is normally required to provide performance comparable to a smaller copper conductor.

However, there is no universal rule such as:

“Always increase aluminum by one AWG size.”

or:

“6 mm² copper always equals 10 mm² aluminum.”

Those shortcuts can produce incorrect cable selections.

The required aluminum cable size depends on:

  • Maximum circuit current

  • Conductor ampacity

  • Cable length

  • System operating voltage

  • Ambient temperature

  • Number of current-carrying conductors

  • Installation method

  • Terminal temperature rating

  • Allowable voltage drop

  • Cable certification

  • Applicable electrical code

The correct approach is therefore to recalculate the circuit when changing conductor material.

Aluminum vs Copper Solar Cable: Cost, Ampacity, Voltage Drop & Which Is Better?

What Aluminum Wire Size Replaces Copper Wire?

This is one of the most common questions when EPC contractors consider moving from copper to aluminum.

Unfortunately, there is no reliable one-line copper-to-aluminum conversion table that works for every PV circuit.


10 AWG Copper vs Aluminum

10 AWG copper:

35 A at 75°C

10 AWG aluminum:

30 A at 75°C

The same AWG aluminum conductor therefore provides lower reference ampacity.


8 AWG Copper vs Aluminum

8 AWG copper:

50 A at 75°C

8 AWG aluminum:

40 A at 75°C

Again, an equal AWG size does not provide equal ampacity.


6 AWG Copper vs Aluminum

6 AWG copper:

65 A at 75°C

6 AWG aluminum:

50 A at 75°C


4 AWG Copper vs Aluminum

4 AWG copper:

85 A at 75°C

4 AWG aluminum:

65 A at 75°C

The correct replacement size must therefore be selected based on the actual current requirement rather than simply matching the original AWG number.

Voltage drop must then be checked separately.



Aluminum vs Copper Solar Cable Voltage Drop

Ampacity and voltage drop are different design considerations.

Ampacity determines whether a conductor can carry the required current safely.

Voltage drop determines how much voltage is lost while current travels through the conductor.

Voltage drop can be expressed approximately as:

Voltage Drop = Current × Circuit Resistance

For a simple two-conductor DC circuit:

Voltage Drop = Current × Resistance per Unit Length × Total Conductor Length

where total conductor length normally includes the outgoing and return path.

The percentage voltage drop is:

Voltage Drop % = Voltage Drop ÷ Operating Voltage × 100

Because aluminum has higher electrical resistance than copper for the same conductor cross-sectional area, an aluminum conductor of the same size generally produces greater voltage drop.

That becomes increasingly important as the cable run becomes longer.



Why Cable Length Changes the Aluminum vs Copper Decision

Imagine two PV projects.

Project A

Cable length: 10 m

Current: Moderate

Installation: Residential rooftop

In this situation, conductor quantity is small and cable runs are short.

Copper's compact conductor size, excellent conductivity and widespread connector compatibility may provide the simplest solution.

Project B

Cable length: Hundreds of meters

Installation: Large ground-mounted solar farm

Cable quantity: Several kilometers or more

In this project, the economics change.

Cable weight, raw material cost, transportation, reel handling and total conductor quantity become much more important.

A larger aluminum conductor may therefore be economically attractive even though more conductor area is required.

This is one reason aluminum becomes particularly interesting for large commercial and utility-scale PV systems.



Aluminum vs Copper Solar Cable Cost

Cost is one of the strongest reasons EPC contractors consider aluminum.

Copper generally has a significantly higher raw-material cost than aluminum. However, comparing only commodity prices is misleading because an aluminum conductor usually needs to be larger.

A proper cost comparison should include:

Conductor Material Cost

Aluminum generally has a lower material cost than copper.

For projects requiring large quantities of cable, this can create substantial savings.

FRCABLE's current aluminum solar cable category estimates that aluminum solutions can reduce conductor material cost by as much as roughly 50% in suitable projects, depending on conductor sizing and metal-market conditions. This should be treated as a project-dependent estimate rather than a universal saving.

Required Cable Size

The lower conductivity of aluminum means more conductor cross-sectional area may be required.

This partially offsets its lower material price.

Therefore, the comparison should not be:

1 meter of 10 mm² copper vs 1 meter of 10 mm² aluminum

if those cables do not provide equivalent electrical performance.

The comparison should instead be between the sizes actually required to satisfy the same circuit.

Transportation and Handling

Weight matters when thousands of meters of cable must be shipped and installed.

FRCABLE currently cites approximately 30–40% lower cable weight for its aluminum solar cable solutions compared with relevant copper alternatives, although the exact difference depends on cable construction and equivalent electrical sizing.

Lower cable weight can affect:

  • Freight

  • Reel handling

  • On-site transportation

  • Installer handling

  • Cable pulling

  • Supporting structures

Connectors and Termination

An aluminum system may require different connectors, lugs or termination procedures.

These costs should be included in the total installed-cost comparison.

Electrical Losses

If aluminum is undersized, higher resistance can increase energy losses.

The conductor should therefore be sized for both ampacity and acceptable voltage drop.

The cheapest cable at the purchasing stage is not necessarily the lowest-cost conductor over the life of a PV system.



Is Aluminum Solar Cable Actually Cheaper Than Copper?

In many large projects, it can be.

But the correct question is:

Is the complete installed aluminum conductor system cheaper than the equivalent copper system?

For a utility-scale project, an EPC should compare:

  • Cable purchase price

  • Required conductor size

  • Transportation

  • Installation labor

  • Terminations

  • Voltage-drop losses

  • Long-term maintenance considerations

Only then can the real cost difference be determined.

This is why aluminum is particularly interesting at MW- and utility-scale, where small savings per meter can become significant when multiplied by a very large cable quantity.


Aluminum vs Copper Cable Weight

Aluminum vs Copper Cable Weight

Aluminum is substantially less dense than copper.

This gives aluminum an important advantage where total conductor weight matters.

Even after increasing the aluminum conductor cross-sectional area to compensate for lower conductivity, the resulting conductor can still offer a useful weight advantage.

The Aluminum Association specifically identifies aluminum's conductivity-to-weight ratio as a major reason for its widespread use in electrical transmission and distribution.

For large PV projects, lower weight can simplify:

  • Cable reel logistics

  • Long-distance transport

  • Cable pulling

  • Field handling

  • Installation across large arrays

For a few meters of residential cable, this difference may not matter.

For kilometers of utility-scale cable, it can become important.



Aluminum vs Copper Solar Cable for Long-Distance Runs

Long cable runs create an interesting trade-off.

Aluminum is attractive because reducing conductor cost over hundreds or thousands of meters can produce significant project savings.

However, long distances also increase voltage drop.

This means aluminum cable must be carefully sized.

Suppose a conductor passes the ampacity calculation but produces excessive voltage drop over a 300-meter DC circuit.

The conductor must be increased until voltage-drop performance is acceptable.

Therefore:

For long-distance PV cable runs, the final aluminum cable size may be controlled by voltage drop rather than ampacity.

This is why FRCABLE recommends evaluating both factors before converting an existing copper design to aluminum.



Is Aluminum PV Cable Good for Utility-Scale Solar?

Utility-scale solar is one of the strongest applications for properly engineered aluminum PV conductors.

Large solar farms often involve:

  • Long cable runs

  • Large conductor sizes

  • High cable quantities

  • 1500V DC system architectures

  • Significant transportation requirements

  • Strong BOS cost pressure

These conditions can make the weight and material-cost advantages of aluminum particularly valuable.

FRCABLE currently provides aluminum PV cable solutions for large PV applications, including TÜV 2PfG 2642 PV1500DC-AL 1.5kV products as well as UL 4703 2kV aluminum PV wire configurations.

The UL 4703 aluminum product range published by FRCABLE extends from 10 AWG to 500 kcmil, allowing significantly larger conductors to be specified for commercial and utility applications.


Aluminum vs Copper Solar Cable: Cost, Ampacity, Voltage Drop & Which Is Better?

Aluminum vs Copper for Residential Solar

For many residential rooftop installations, copper remains the more practical conductor.

Residential PV systems typically have:

  • Shorter cable runs

  • Smaller conductor sizes

  • Limited routing space

  • High flexibility requirements

  • Connectors and equipment commonly designed around copper conductors

Because copper provides higher conductivity in a smaller cross-sectional area, it is well suited to these installations.

This does not mean aluminum cannot be used in a residential electrical system where appropriately designed and permitted.

It simply means that the economic advantages of aluminum are often less significant when the project uses relatively small quantities of cable.



Aluminum vs Copper for Commercial Solar

Commercial PV systems sit between residential and utility-scale applications.

The decision can depend heavily on system layout.

Copper may remain preferable for:

  • Module-level wiring

  • Tight routing areas

  • Short cable runs

  • Smaller conductor requirements

Aluminum may become more attractive for:

  • Larger feeder circuits

  • Long rooftop or ground runs

  • High cable quantities

  • Large current-carrying conductors

Some projects may therefore use different conductor materials in different parts of the electrical system.

If both materials are used, the transition between copper and aluminum must be properly engineered.



Can Aluminum Cable Be Connected to Copper?

Copper and aluminum connections require special attention.

Aluminum and copper do not have identical mechanical and electrochemical characteristics, so termination methods should be appropriate for the conductor material and equipment being used.

The Aluminum Association notes that aluminum and copper conductors require somewhat different installation and termination practices.

Where aluminum conductors interface with copper equipment or conductors, connectors and terminals should be specifically rated for the intended material combination and installed according to the connector and equipment manufacturers' instructions.

Suitable designs may use bimetallic copper-aluminum terminals or other approved transition systems.

FRCABLE similarly recommends appropriate copper-aluminum termination methods where dissimilar metals meet to reduce the risk of connection problems and galvanic corrosion.

Incorrect termination can defeat the economic benefit of choosing aluminum in the first place.



Is Aluminum PV Cable Safe?

Yes—when the cable is designed for the application, correctly sized, properly terminated and installed according to the applicable standard and electrical code.

Aluminum electrical conductors are not new. The Aluminum Association notes that aluminum has been used extensively in utility transmission and distribution and other electrical applications for decades.

The important distinction is between:

properly engineered modern aluminum conductor systems

and

incorrectly selected or improperly terminated aluminum wiring.

A solar installation should use cable specifically designed and certified for the intended photovoltaic application rather than assuming that any aluminum electrical wire can be used as PV cable.



Is Aluminum Solar Cable Less Durable Than Copper?

Conductor material alone does not determine PV cable service life.

Outdoor solar cable performance depends on the complete cable system, including:

  • Conductor alloy

  • Insulation

  • Outer jacket

  • UV resistance

  • Ozone resistance

  • Moisture resistance

  • Temperature capability

  • Mechanical design

  • Termination quality

  • Installation environment

Modern aluminum-alloy conductors are substantially different from early generations of aluminum building wire.

FRCABLE's aluminum PV products are designed specifically for outdoor photovoltaic applications, with product options intended for 1500V and 2000V DC solar systems.

As with copper, long-term reliability depends on correct product selection and installation.



Can Aluminum Solar Cable Replace Copper Solar Cable?

Yes, in suitable applications—but it should not be treated as a direct same-size replacement.

Before converting from copper to aluminum, recalculate:

1. Maximum Circuit Current

Determine the maximum required PV circuit current.

2. Required Ampacity

Select an aluminum conductor that satisfies the applicable ampacity requirement after required temperature and conductor adjustment factors.

3. Voltage Drop

Calculate voltage drop over the complete cable run.

4. Cable Size

Increase conductor size if voltage drop requires a larger cable than ampacity alone.

5. Termination Compatibility

Verify that connectors, lugs, combiner boxes, disconnects, inverters and other equipment are suitable for aluminum conductors or use an approved transition system.

6. Cable Certification

Verify that the cable certification and voltage rating are suitable for the PV installation and target market.

Only after these steps should a copper design be converted to aluminum.



Aluminum vs Copper for 1500V Solar Systems

Modern utility-scale PV plants commonly use high-voltage DC architectures to transmit more power efficiently through the array.

For these applications, conductor optimization becomes especially important because high cable quantities magnify differences in:

  • Cable price

  • Weight

  • Resistance

  • Voltage drop

  • Installation requirements

FRCABLE currently lists AL Solar TÜV 2PfG 2642 PV1500DC-AL 1.5kV among its aluminum photovoltaic cable products.

For North American and other projects specifying UL products, FRCABLE also offers UL 4703 2kV aluminum PV wire, including single-layer and dual-layer configurations.

Selection should be based on the specific project standard rather than choosing conductor material first and certification second.



When Should You Choose Aluminum PV Cable?

Aluminum deserves serious consideration when a project has several of the following characteristics:

  • Large ground-mounted PV plant

  • Utility-scale project

  • Large cable quantities

  • Long cable runs

  • Larger conductor sizes

  • Strong BOS cost targets

  • High transportation or handling costs

  • Sufficient installation space for a larger conductor

  • Equipment compatible with aluminum terminations

In these situations, the lower material cost and lower weight of aluminum can become strategically important.




When Is Copper PV Cable the Better Choice?

Copper may be preferable when:

  • Cable runs are short

  • Conductor sizes are small

  • Routing space is limited

  • High conductor flexibility is required

  • Compact connectors are important

  • Equipment is designed primarily for copper

  • The total quantity of cable is relatively small

  • Voltage-drop requirements favor a smaller high-conductivity conductor

This is why copper continues to be highly suitable for module-level wiring and many residential PV systems.



Aluminum vs Copper Solar Cable: Which Is Better?

There is no universal winner.

Choose Copper When Compact Size and Conductivity Matter Most

Copper offers:

Higher conductivity

Higher ampacity for the same AWG

Lower resistance for the same conductor size

Lower voltage drop for equal-size conductors

Smaller conductor dimensions for a given electrical requirement

It therefore remains an excellent choice for residential PV, short runs, smaller cables and installations with restricted routing space.

Consider Aluminum When Project Scale and Cost Matter Most

Aluminum offers:

Lower conductor material cost

Lower conductor weight

Strong conductivity-to-weight performance

Potential BOS savings at large scale

It becomes especially attractive when projects involve long cable runs, large conductors and very high cable quantities.

For utility-scale projects, a properly sized aluminum conductor can therefore provide a strong balance between electrical performance and project economics.



Aluminum vs Copper Solar Cable Selection Table

Project Type

Typical Preferred Option

Why

Residential rooftop PV

Copper

Compact size, short runs, easy termination

Small commercial rooftop

Usually copper

Smaller conductor sizes and limited space

Large commercial rooftop

Project-dependent

Cable length and feeder size become important

Ground-mounted commercial PV

Copper or aluminum

Depends on run length and conductor size

Utility-scale solar farm

Aluminum deserves strong consideration

Long runs, large cable volume and BOS savings

Large PV feeder circuits

Aluminum can be attractive

Larger conductor sizes improve aluminum economics

Tight module-level wiring

Copper

Flexibility and compact dimensions

Long-distance high-volume wiring

Aluminum can be attractive

Cost and weight become increasingly important



Frequently Asked Questions


Is aluminum wire good for solar panels?

Yes, aluminum conductors can be used in appropriately designed photovoltaic systems when the cable is specifically suitable for PV applications, correctly sized and terminated using equipment compatible with aluminum conductors. Aluminum is particularly attractive for commercial and utility-scale projects with large cable quantities.


Is aluminum solar cable cheaper than copper?

Generally, aluminum conductor material is less expensive than copper. However, aluminum normally requires a larger conductor size, so the correct comparison should be based on equivalent electrical performance and total installed project cost rather than the price of the same mm² or AWG size.


Does aluminum solar cable need to be larger than copper?

Usually, yes. Aluminum has approximately 61% of copper's electrical conductivity, so a larger aluminum conductor is generally required for comparable resistance

or current-carrying performance.


Does aluminum have more voltage drop than copper?

For the same conductor size, length and current, aluminum generally produces more voltage drop because its electrical resistance is higher than copper. Increasing the aluminum conductor size can reduce this difference.


Can I replace copper solar cable with the same AWG aluminum cable?

Not automatically. Copper and aluminum conductors of the same AWG size have different ampacity and resistance values. Ampacity, voltage drop, cable length, temperature and termination requirements should be recalculated before changing conductor material.


What aluminum wire size replaces copper?

There is no universal conversion size. The replacement should be calculated according to required ampacity and voltage drop. A cable may satisfy the current requirement but still need to be increased because of a long cable run.


Is aluminum PV cable suitable for long distances?

It can be particularly attractive for long-distance PV runs because of lower material cost and weight. However, long runs increase voltage drop, so conductor size must be carefully calculated.


Can aluminum cable connect directly to copper equipment?

The termination must be specifically approved for the conductor materials involved. Where aluminum and copper interface, use terminals, connectors or transition systems rated for the intended combination and follow the equipment manufacturer's installation requirements.


Is aluminum PV cable suitable for 1500V systems?

Yes, when a cable is specifically designed and certified for the application. FRCABLE offers TÜV 2PfG 2642 PV1500DC-AL aluminum solar cable for 1500V DC photovoltaic applications.


Is aluminum PV wire available for 2000V solar systems?

Yes. FRCABLE currently offers UL 4703 aluminum PV wire configurations designed for 2000V DC photovoltaic systems, including single-layer and dual-layer products.



Final Takeaway

The decision between aluminum and copper solar cable should not be based on conductor price alone.

Copper provides higher conductivity, greater ampacity for a given conductor size and lower resistance. These characteristics make copper particularly effective where cable dimensions, flexibility and compact installation are important.

Aluminum provides a different advantage: lower weight and potentially lower conductor cost. As project scale, cable length and conductor size increase, these advantages can become increasingly valuable.

For this reason, copper remains highly practical for residential and smaller PV connections, while properly sized aluminum PV cable deserves strong consideration for large commercial, ground-mounted and utility-scale solar projects.

The key is correct engineering.

When converting from copper to aluminum, always recalculate:

Ampacity

Cable size

Voltage drop

Cable length

Temperature derating

Termination compatibility

Applicable certification and electrical code

The best solar cable is not simply the cheapest conductor or the material with the highest conductivity.

It is the cable that delivers the required electrical performance, reliability and total project economics for the specific PV installation.



Looking for Aluminum PV Cable for Your Solar Project?

FRCABLE supplies photovoltaic cable solutions for residential, commercial, industrial and utility-scale solar applications, including copper solar cable and aluminum PV cable configurations.

For aluminum PV projects, available solutions include TÜV 2PfG 2642 PV1500DC-AL 1.5kV and UL 4703 2kV aluminum PV wire.

Send FRCABLE your:

System voltage

Maximum circuit current

Required cable length

Required conductor size

Target certification

Project location/application

Our team can help identify a suitable aluminum or copper PV cable specification for your project.

Technical note: Ampacity values and comparisons in this guide are reference information only. Final conductor selection should be based on the applicable electrical code, installation conditions, equipment ratings, project engineering requirements and the specific cable datasheet.

 
 
 

Comments


About Us

 Founded in 2007, FRCABLE is a trailblazing company in the solar photovoltaic industry, specializing in the production of high-quality cables and cross-linked cables.

whatsapp.png
bottom of page